Our Nagging Employment Problem, Part 1

Chris Fleisher in a weekend Pittsburgh “Tribune-Review” article [go here: http://triblive.com/business/headlines/10310205-74/growth-job-region] nails it when reporting on the surprisingly stubborn low job growth in southwestern Pennsylvania.  Job creation in our region is quite simply the most important issue the region faces.  It’s not an exaggeration to state that this is the Pittsburgh region’s existential issue.

Over the past couple years since I’ve been putting my thoughts to electronic “paper” in this blog, I think it’s clear that most of my pieces focus on jobs and income.  Both must increase if the region is to continue to provide residents with the lives they deserve.  And I admit it: I am completely stymied as to why the region continues to lag woefully behind just about every other place in the country when it comes to job creation.  For all the accolades Pittsburgh now garners, in the final analysis, those count for diddly-squat if residents can’t make a good living.

It’s been widely reported that an Uber executive publicly noted that he could “hire 100 more people tomorrow if…” he could find candidates with the right qualifications.  That’s NOT a “good problem” to have.  So here we are: Pittsburgh attracts one of the world’s hottest “new economy” companies to set up a major facility and now they have trouble staffing it.  What gives?  What about the hundreds of eager computer science grads who come out of the region’s colleges and universities?  Not qualified?  Oh but then we read that Pittsburgh is still having trouble retaining young people who are leaving for higher paying areas like the big coastal centers. Really?  Is it simply that companies like Uber can come into town paying third-world salaries because Pittsburgh has a lower cost of living than Palo Alto?  I bet not. So is it just that Pittsburgh’s college grads are so much more sophisticated than those coming out of UNC who stay in the Research Triangle, or those out of UT who then stay in Austin, or those silly grads from Stanford and Cal who triple up in $4000 a month one bedroom apartments in San Francisco?  I bet not and I’m sure I’ll win that one.

You understand my confusion?  And concern.  No region holds onto all its children.  There are a million ways in this world to make your success and there is a whole planet’s worth of locales in which to do that. But if a region is not generating enough new jobs to retain those individuals for whom staying put is the easiest path, how can we possibly expect to attract and hold new residents who will by definition expand the economic and intellectual vitality of the area?

However, having said all that, I still believe there’s a solution here.  Part 2 to follow.