President Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord and
stated his intention to renegotiate the terms.
For anyone in business who has ever dealt with a tough negotiator, this
approach should not surprise.
But as someone who literally happened to be within earshot
of an office television at the moment he mentioned “Pittsburgh, not Paris” and
then later on when he spoke of “Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Youngstown, Ohio and
Detroit, Michigan” in the same context, I figured then and there some poo-poo
was gonna hit someone’s fan. Don’t get
me wrong; this kerfuffle [only in Pittsburgh] over Pittsburgh being mentioned
by the President who, for many, is making a colossal mistake in this Climate
agreement pull-out is "mouse nuts" in the larger scheme of the world’s current
issues. But it has some relevance to how
Pittsburgh perceives itself as well as how it’s perceived by the larger world.
I myself was not happy to have our burgeoning high tech hub
described alongside Youngstown and Detroit [though full disclosure makes me
admit there are many lovely parts of and fun activities in both those metro
areas] as that typecasts Pittsburgh as one of the stereotypical dead and dying
cities. Well so be it. Our President is from New York with all the
prejudices that encompasses.
What I am dismayed with is the attitude, again, of Mayor
Peduto who was “offended” that Pittsburgh was mentioned in the context of
pulling out of the Climate agreement. Or
was it that the Left’s latest “evil one”, the anti-Christ to Peduto’s political
party, simply uttered the term “Pittsburgh” from his lips? Your call.
Here’s the thing: Peduto needs to admit to and then face up
to the hard truth – as our friends in AA would have him do – that the popular
perception of Pittsburgh as an economic backwater compared to more successful
cities is, well, true. Unemployment
rate? We have been consistently one
percentage point higher than the national average during this anemic recovery
period. And let’s not talk about that
rate compared with other second tier cities in our so-called “cohort
group”. We have an unemployment rate
fully two-plus percentage point higher than cities like Charlotte, Columbus,
and Nashville. And don’t get me started
about income levels. It’s ALL ABOUT
income, and Pittsburgh is a historical laggard when it comes to per capita
income. What good is inexpensive housing when you don’t have income to afford a lifestyle you really want?
Lastly, while I’m on this rant, let’s talk about how the
Pittsburgh region is still a net exporter of young and talented people to other
parts of the country. This is personal
for me today. Just this week my cousin’s
daughter who was married last year to a great guy, both having jobs they
enjoyed and a new house in Bellevue, announced they are moving to Atlanta for
better jobs. I lived in Atlanta and I
know the god, bad and ugly and believe me there’s a lot of that. But jobs?
Those it has in spades. Something
a young couple looking to make their mark on the world have a much harder time
finding in metro Pittsburgh.
I realize Peduto isn’t the mayor of the metropolitan
area. But he’s the most visible
spokesperson. Maybe when he admits
Pittsburgh still suffers from a century long economic malaise that shows little
signs of going away will we finally see some concrete [tax cuts? more economic
incentives for relocating companies?] actions to help stimulate the local
economy.
Ending this screed on a positive note, I see that
Milllcraft Investments has decided that the downtown Pittsburgh market is ripe
again for condo development and is returning to a plan that puts condominiums
on the former Saks Fifth Avenue site on Smithfield Street. Millcraft believes there is demand for
owner-occupied apartments as opposed to rental units. This is great news for downtown. Homeowners, even high rise homeowners, bring
a level of social and economic stability to an area that can only translate
into even more development.